Promiscuity in an evolved pair-bonding system: Mating within and outside the pleistocene box

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):290-291 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Across mammals, when fathers matter, as they did for hunter-gatherers, sex-similar pair-bonding mechanisms evolve. Attachment fertility theory can explain Schmitt's and other findings as resulting from a system of mechanisms affording pair-bonding in which promiscuous seeking is part. Departures from hunter-gatherer environments (e.g., early menarche, delayed marriage) can alter dating trajectories, thereby impacting mating outside of pair-bonds.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pair bonding and proximal mechanisms.Glenn E. King - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (2):191-192.
Deacon's Dilemma: The Problem of Pair-bonding in Human Evolution.Robin Dunbar - 2010 - In Robin Dunbar, Clive Gamble & John Gowlett (eds.), Social Brain, Distributed Mind. OUP/British Academy. pp. 155.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
164 (#141,066)

6 months
10 (#381,237)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references