In Defense of a Supernatural Foundation to Morality: Reply to Shermer

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences:91-96 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In my original paper, I claimed that our moral obligations are real, objective, and grounded in the supernatural. In particular, I endorsed the claim that God's will is the basis or source of our moral obligations, where “God” is to be understood as the theistic being who is omnibenevolent, omniscient, and omnipotent, who created the universe, and who is still actively involved in the universe after creating it. In his critical article, Michael Shermer has raised a number of important challenges to my view. Here I try to defend the position and respond to at least his most serious objections.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-28

Downloads
67 (#315,274)

6 months
67 (#88,093)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christian Miller
Wake Forest University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references