A Paradox of Information.A Comment on Miller's New Paradox of Information.A Paradox of Zero Information.Miller's So-called Paradox: A Reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.Miller's paradox of Information.The Straight and Narrow Rule of Induction: A Reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.New Mysteries for Old: The Transfiguration of Miller's Paradox

Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The straight and narrow rule of induction: A reply to dr Bub and mr Radner.David Miller - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):145-152.
New mysteries for old: The transfiguration of Miller's paradox.William W. Rozeboom - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (4):345-353.
On a so-Called so-Called Paradox: A Reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.David Miller - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):147-149.
A comment on Miller's new paradox of information.Karl R. Popper - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):61-69.
Miller's so-called paradox of information.Colin Howson & Graham Oddie - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (3):253-261.
Miller's so-called paradox of information.J. L. Mackie - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):144-147.
Erratum.[author unknown] - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (3):264-264.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
33 (#675,875)

6 months
8 (#551,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey Bub
University of Maryland, College Park

Citations of this work

Fading Foundations: Probability and the Regress Problem.Jeanne Peijnenburg - 2017 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Edited by Jeanne Peijnenburg.
Unprincipled.Gordon Belot - 2024 - Review of Symbolic Logic 17 (2):435-474.
Have your cake and eat it too: The old principal principle reconciled with the new.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):368–382.
Popper, prior probabilities, and inductive inference.Colin Howson - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (2):207-224.
Doxastic paradoxes without self-reference.Robert C. Koons - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (2):168 – 177.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references