Revision and Immortality in Philosophical Argumentation: Continuing Thoughts on the Rhetorical Wedge

Informal Logic 21 (1) (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay explores Johnstone's idea that "rhetoric is a wedge." In particular, it explores the place of this idea in Johnstone's philosophy of argument, the need to confront this idea with argument, and ways of confronting it with ad rem and ad hominem arguments

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
88 (#239,095)

6 months
22 (#137,212)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Elements of logic.Richard Whately - 1827 - Delmar, N.Y.: Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints.
Elements of logic.Richard Whately - 1990 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 180 (4):720-720.
Rhetoric of Appeal and Rhetoric of Response.George E. Yoos - 1987 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 20 (2):106 - 117.
Argumentation and Inconsistency.Henry W. Johnstone - 1961 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 15 (4=58):353.

View all 8 references / Add more references