Private International Law as an Ethic of Responsivity

In Veronica Ruiz Abou-Nigm & Maria Blanca Noodt Taquela, Diversity and Integration in Private International Law (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The world is a mess. Populism, xenophobia, and islamophobia; misogyny and racism; the closing of borders against the neediest—the existential crisis of modernity calls for a firm response from ethics. Why, instead of engaging with these problems through traditional ethics, worry about private international law, that most technical of technical fields of law? My claim in this chapter: not despite, because of its technical character. Private international law provides such an ethic, an ethic of responsivity. It provides us with a technique of ethics, a technique that helps us conceptualise and address some of the most pressing issues of our time. It is not only ethically relevant, it is itself an ethic. Let me explain.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-27

Downloads
15 (#1,278,503)

6 months
4 (#864,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Recognition without Ethics?Nancy Fraser - 2001 - Theory, Culture and Society 18 (2-3):21-42.
Toleration.Rainer Forst - 2012 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Question of the Other.Bernhard Waldenfels - 2007 - State University of New York Press.
Law and recognition: towards a relational concept of law.Ralf Michaels - 2017 - In Nicole Roughan & Andrew Halpin, In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence. Cambridge [UK]: Cambridge University Press.

Add more references