Prior and the Platonist

Analysis 62 (3):211-216 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to draw attention to a conflict between two popular views about time: Arthur Prior’s proposal for treating tense on the model of modal logic, and the ‘Platonic’ thesis that some objects (God, forms, universals, or numbers) exist eternally.1 I will argue that anyone who accepts the former ought to reject the latter.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mathematics, Time, and Confirmation.Ulrich Meyer - 2001 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Time and Modality.Ulrich Meyer - 2011 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press. pp. 91--121.
A Study in the Temporal Ontology of Tense Logic.David John Zacker - 1996 - Dissertation, Michigan State University
A.N. Prior's Logic.Peter Ohrstrom, Per F. W. Hasle & David Jakobsen - 2018 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Arthur N. Prior and the Lvov-Warsaw School.Zuzana Rybaříková - 2023 - History and Philosophy of Logic 44 (1):91-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
155 (#148,324)

6 months
20 (#147,057)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ulrich Meyer
Colgate University

Citations of this work

Presentism and the Problem of Cross-Time Relations.Rafael De Clercq - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):386 - 402.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references