Distributive Justice and Climate Change. The Allocation of Emission Rights

Analyse & Kritik 28 (2):223-249 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The emission of greenhouse gases causes climate change. Therefore, many support a global cap on emissions. How then should the emissions allowed under this cap be distributed? We first show that above average past emissions cannot be used to justify a right to above average current emissions. We then sketch three basic principles of distributive justice and argue, first, that prioritarian standards are the most plausible and, second, that they speak in favour of giving people of developing countries higher emission rights than people of industrialised countries. In order to support this point it has to be shown, inter alia, in what ways the higher past emissions of industrialised countries are relevant for today’s distribution of emission rights

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Climate justice and historical emissions.Lukas H. Meyer & Dominic Roser - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):229-253.
A Lockean Defence of Grandfathering Emission Rights.Luc Bovens - 2011 - In Denis G. Arnold (ed.), The Ethics of Global Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. pp. 124-44.
Justice and the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions.Simon Caney - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (2):125-146.
Moderate Emissions Grandfathering.Carl Knight - 2014 - Environmental Values 23 (5):571-592.
What We Owe to Each Other.Mingming Wan - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 11:169-173.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-27

Downloads
69 (#305,058)

6 months
16 (#187,891)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Lukas Meyer
University of Graz
Dominic Roser
University of Zürich

Citations of this work

The supersession thesis, climate change, and the rights of future people.Santiago Truccone-Borgogno - 2022 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25 (3):364-379.
Climate justice and historical emissions.Lukas H. Meyer & Dominic Roser - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):229-253.
Climate Justice and the Duty of Restitution.Santiago Truccone-Borgogno - 2023 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 10 (1):203-224.
How legitimate expectations matter in climate justice.Lukas H. Meyer & Pranay Sanklecha - 2014 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (4):369-393.
Collective responsibility for climate change.Säde Hormio - 2023 - WIREs Climate Change 14 (4).

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Equality and priority.Derek Parfit - 1997 - Ratio 10 (3):202–221.
Equality, priority, and compassion.Roger Crisp - 2003 - Ethics 113 (4):745-763.
Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility, and Global Climate Change.Simon Caney - 2005 - Leiden Journal of International Law 18 (4):747-775.
Subsistence Emissions and Luxury Emissions.Henry Shue - 1993 - Law and Policy 15 (1):39–59.

View all 10 references / Add more references