Could sign-based semantics and embodied semantics benefit one another?

Manuscrito 45 (1):123-144 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that Duffley’s sign-based semantics and embodied semantics may be mutually beneficial if we conceive them as a semantic theory and as a foundational theory, respectively. First, I describe embodied semantics as a research program that conceives the foundations of meaning in terms of embodied simulation. Afterwards, I draw attention to three points where Duffley’s semantics could find support in such a foundational theory. Finally, I suggest that two pressing challenges currently on the agenda of embodied semantics could be met by Duffley’s theory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-01

Downloads
22 (#1,015,764)

6 months
13 (#197,488)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The symbol grounding problem.Stevan Harnad - 1990 - Physica D 42:335-346.
Theories of Meaning.Jeff Speaks - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Words in the brain's language. PulvermÜ & Friedemann Ller - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):253-279.
Theories of meaning (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).Jeff Speaks - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 8 references / Add more references