God and Probability

Religious Studies 5 (2):223 - 234 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My object in this paper is to consider what relevance, if any, current analyses of probability have to problems of religious belief. There is no doubt that words such as ‘probable’ are used in this context; what is doubtful is that this use can be analysed as other major uses of such words can. I shall conclude that this use cannot be so analysed and hence, given the preponderance of the other uses that can, that it is misleading.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,101

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
102 (#218,262)

6 months
15 (#201,246)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh Mellor
Last affiliation: Cambridge University

Citations of this work

Is Our Universe a Mere Fluke? The Cosmological Argument and Spinning the Universes.Jaap Van Brakel - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:75-82.
On salmon's attempt to redesign the design argument.Delmas Lewis - 1982 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (2):77 - 84.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references