What do we think we’re doing?

Plato Journal 16:9-20 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I suggest that there are no universally applicable principles for the study of Plato’s philosophy. Different students of Plato have different objects of interest that can make different ways of proceeding appropriate. For me the dialogues are the main object of study; I think they are best approached by interpreting literary elements and obviously philosophical content as working together. The paper includes illustrations of how parts of my picture of the developing theory of forms emerge from this type of engagement.

Other Versions

original Meinwald, Constance (2017) "What do we think we’re doing?". Plato Journal 16():9-20

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dialogue and Dialectic.David Evans - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:61-65.
The Unfolding Account of Forms in the Phaedo.David Ebrey - 2022 - In David Ebrey & Richard Kraut (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 268-297.
A Dialogue between Nin and de Beauvoir.Johanna E. van Aller - 1996 - Dialogue and Universalism 6 (5):41-52.
On reading plato mimetically.Hayden W. Ausland - 1997 - American Journal of Philology 118 (3):371-416.
The Conclusion of the Theaetetus.Samuel C. Wheeler - 1984 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 1 (4):355-367.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-03

Downloads
26 (#856,815)

6 months
4 (#1,258,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Constance Meinwald
University of Illinois, Chicago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations