Did Descartes make a Diagonal Argument?

Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (2):219-247 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the idea that Descartes’ cogito is a kind of diagonal argument. Using tools from modal logic, it reviews some historical antecedents of this idea from Slezak and Boos and culminates in an orginal result classifying the exact structure of belief frames capable of supporting diagonal arguments and our reconstruction of the cogito.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Was Descartes's cogito a diagonal deduction?Roy A. Sorensen - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (3):346-351.
The diagonal argument and the liar.Keith Simmons - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (3):277 - 303.
Descartes's diagonal deduction.Peter Slezak - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (March):13-36.
Constructing Cantorian counterexamples.George Boolos - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (3):237-239.
On the diagonal lemma of Gödel and Carnap.Saeed Salehi - 2020 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 26 (1):80-88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-20

Downloads
101 (#210,239)

6 months
9 (#500,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Toby Meadows
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.
Outline of a theory of truth.Saul Kripke - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
Saving truth from paradox.Hartry Field - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):105-116.

View all 26 references / Add more references