- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A Response to Núñez et al.'s “What Happened to Cognitive Science?”
Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (4):914-917 (2019)
Abstract
Núñez et al.'s (2019) negative assessment of the field of cognitive science derives from evaluation criteria that fail to reflect the true nature of the field. In reality, the field is thriving on both the research and educational fronts, and it shows great promise for the future.Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
For the Sciences They Are A‐Changin’: A Response to Commentaries on Núñez et al.’s (2019) “What Happened to Cognitive Science?”.Rafael Núñez, Michael Allen, Richard Gao, Carson Miller Rigoli, Josephine Relaford-Doyle & Arturs Semenuks - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (3):790-803.
Multidisciplinary Flux and Multiple Research Traditions Within Cognitive Science.Richard P. Cooper - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (4):869-879.
The Value of Diversity in Cognitive Science.Andrea Bender - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (4):853-863.
Rumors of Our Death….Gwen J. Broude, Kenneth R. Livingston, Joshua R. Leeuw, Janet K. Andrews & John H. Long - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (4):864-868.
Rumors of Our Death….Gwen J. Broude, Kenneth R. Livingston, Joshua R. de Leeuw, Janet K. Andrews & John H. Long - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (4):864-868.
Cognitive Science Is and Should Be Pluralistic.Dedre Gentner - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (4):884-891.
What Should Cognitive Science Look Like? Neither a Tree Nor Physics.Christian D. Schunn - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (4):845-852.
Missing the Forest for the Trees: Why Cognitive Science Circa 2019 Is Alive and Well.Robert M. French - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (4):880-883.
Psychology in Cognitive Science: 1978–2038.Dedre Gentner - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):328-344.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-10-06
Downloads
34 (#665,199)
6 months
7 (#706,906)
2019-10-06
Downloads
34 (#665,199)
6 months
7 (#706,906)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
For the Sciences They Are A‐Changin’: A Response to Commentaries on Núñez et al.’s (2019) “What Happened to Cognitive Science?”.Rafael Núñez, Michael Allen, Richard Gao, Carson Miller Rigoli, Josephine Relaford-Doyle & Arturs Semenuks - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (3):790-803.
Three Simple Rules for Good Cognitive Science.Doug Hardman - 2022 - Cognitive Science 46 (7):e13172.
Interdisciplinarity in Cognitive Science: A Document Similarity Analysis.Oguzhan Alasehir & Cengiz Acarturk - 2022 - Cognitive Science 46 (12):e13222.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-6qn2c uwo