The Argument From Design

Philosophy 32 (122):219-228 (1957)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“NATURAL theology” is generally used as the name of a study which seeks to “get at religious truth” by the use of man's reasoning powers, and not to expound revelation. But I want to limit its application to part of this field. By natural theology I mean here a study which seeks to “get at religious truth” by an empirical examination of things, and not by “pure reason.” It is a “scientific” theology. An example of a natural theologian in this sense would be, I suppose, the author of any one of the Bridgewater Treatises, or Paley, or F. R. Tennant. Perhaps I might have called this kind of theology “empirical theology” ; but I do not want to invent new terms more than I have to.

Other Versions

edition Mcpherson, Thomas; Barnes, Jonathan; Miles, T. R.; Smart, Ninian (1975) "The Argument from Design". Mind 84(335):472-474

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The argument from design.Thomas McPherson - 1972 - [New York]: St. Martin's Press.
Evolution and the Argument from Design.Kenneth V. Nelson - 1978 - Religious Studies 14 (4):423 - 443.
Kant’s Theory of Biology and the Argument from Design.Ina Goy - 2014 - In Eric Watkins & Ina Goy (eds.), Kant's Theory of Biology. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 203-220.
Remarks on the Argument from Design.Kenneth T. Gallagher - 1994 - Review of Metaphysics 48 (1):19 - 31.
A priori judgments and the argument from design.Mark Wynn - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 39 (3):169 - 185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
35 (#646,056)

6 months
7 (#706,906)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical Theology.Rufus M. Jones & F. R. Tennant - 1930 - Philosophical Review 39 (1):96.

Add more references