Requesting Belief

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (1) (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Requests belong to a family of forms of social influence on action that appear problematic when employed in the attempt to directly influence belief. Explaining why this is so is more difficult than it might at first appear. The fact that belief is not directly subject to the will can only be part of the explanation. It must also be the case that requests are incapable of providing epistemic reasons in a way that parallels that in which they provide practical reasons. I propose an account of the nature of requests that is in a position to explain why requests are incapable of doing this.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,024

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-01

Downloads
90 (#240,009)

6 months
2 (#1,307,502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benjamin McMyler
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

There is no such thing as doxastic wrongdoing.David Enoch & Levi Spectre - forthcoming - Philosophical Perspectives.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Wrong Kind of Reason.Pamela Hieronymi - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy 102 (9):437 - 457.
Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956–1972.Bernard Williams (ed.) - 1973 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references