The Ethics of Evangelism: Why You Can’t Be a Good Physician and Support Crisis Pregnancy Centers

In Lisa Campo-Engelstein & Paul Burcher, Reproductive Ethics Ii: New Ideas and Innovations. Springer Verlag. pp. 151-160 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Crisis pregnancy centers are a worldwide phenomenon typically run by religious organizations who aim to prevent abortion by disseminating misleading and false information about abortion and/or contraception through volunteer-run centers that advertise themselves as medical clinics. CPCs violate basic principles of biomedical ethics through these actions by inhibiting patient autonomy via incomplete disclosure of information, making it impossible for patients to make autonomous decisions about their pregnancy options. This is comparable to not providing risks and benefits before a planned surgical procedure. CPCs also create potentially hazardous medical situations and perpetuate imbalances in social justice, violating other biomedical principles as well. Patients must be allowed to decide what is beneficence for them, including whether the fetus should be considered a patient, invalidating the potential argument that CPCs practice beneficence by preventing abortion. Given these violations, medical professionals cannot ethically support CPCs and should advocate against them given their potential to undermine the doctor-patient relationship.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,945

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Authentic Meaning of Free Speech.Michael Arthur Vacca - 2020 - Ethics and Medics 45 (3):3-4.
The Pregnancy Rescue Case: why abortion is immoral.Perry Hendricks - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (5):332-334.
For the patient's good: the restoration of beneficence in health care.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David C. Thomasma.
Case studies in biomedical ethics: decision-making, principles, and cases.Robert M. Veatch - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Amy Marie Haddad & Dan C. English.
DRGs and the Ethical Reallocation of Resources.Robert M. Veatch - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (3):32-40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-12

Downloads
7 (#1,686,970)

6 months
5 (#830,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references