Defending commercial surrogate motherhood against Van Niekerk and Van Zyl

Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (6):344-348 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The arguments of Van Niekerk and Van Zyl that, on the grounds that it involves an inappropriate commodification and alienation of women's labour, commercial surrogate motherhood (CSM) is morally suspect are discussed and considered to be defective. In addition, doubt is cast on the notion that CSM should be illegal

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Exploitation and commercial surrogate motherhood.Hugh McLachlan & J. Swales - 2001 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 7 (1):8--14.
Surrogate Motherhood.Rosemarie Tong - 2003 - In R. G. Frey & Christopher Heath Wellman (eds.), A Companion to Applied Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 369–381.
Sandel on enhancement: A response to Van Niekerk.Brian Penrose - 2016 - South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (2):145-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
200 (#124,296)

6 months
14 (#224,604)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Add more references