Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: a five‐year study of assessment by peer review

, &
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (6):622-629 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00630.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The assessment of criterion audit cycles by external peer review – when is an audit not an audit?Paul Bowie, Sarah Cooke, Penny Lo, John McKay & Murray Lough - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (3):352-357.
Judging the quality of clinical audit by general practitioners: a pilot study comparing the assessments of medical peers and NHS audit specialists.Paul Bowie, John McKay, Lilian Murray & Murray Lough - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (6):1038-1043.
External feedback in general practice: a focus group study of trained peer reviewers of significant event analyses.John McKay, Lindsey Pope, Paul Bowie & Murray Lough - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (1):142-147.
The UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project – a feasibility study of large‐scale clinical service peer review.Christopher M. Roberts, Rhona J. Buckingham, Robert A. Stone, Derek Lowe & Michael G. Pearson - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (5):927-932.
Improving general practitioner records in France by a two‐round medical audit.Jean Brami & Michel Doumenc - 2002 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 (2):175-181.
Clinical audit: Audit in british general practice: Domination or disillusionment?John D. Holden - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (3):313-322.
The involvement of pharmacists in professional and clinical audit in the UK: a review and assessment of their potential role.Rhona Panton & Raymond Fitzpatrick - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (3):193-198.
Prescribing pattern of antihypertensive drugs by family physicians and general practitioners in the primary care setting in Bahrain.Reginald P. Sequeira, Khalid A. Jassim, Awatif H. H. Damanhori & Vijay S. Mathur - 2002 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 (4):407-414.
Improving diabetes care in a public hospital medical clinic: report of a completed audit cycle.Florence Tan, Shan F. Liew, Grace Chan, Vivien Toh & See Y. Wong - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (1):40-44.
User involvement in clinical audit: a review of developments and issues of good practice. [REVIEW]Marcia Kelson - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (2):97-109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-03

Downloads
36 (#627,593)

6 months
8 (#583,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Clinical audit and quality improvement–time for a rethink?Paul Bowie, Nicholas A. Bradley & Rosemary Rushmer - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (1):42-48.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Clinical audit in the National Health Service: fact or fiction?A. Miles, P. Bentley, A. Polychronis, N. Price & J. Grey - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (1):29-35.

Add more references