Toward Regulating Human Enhancement Technologies

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (2):49-50 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rawlsian “Neutrality” and Enhancement Technologies.Richard H. Dees - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (2):54-55.
Cognitive Enhancement: Toward a Rational Public Consensus.Eman Ahmed & Kristien Hens - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):263-265.
Human Enhancement and the Common Good.Michael Hauskeller - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (3):37-39.
R-HETs and the Veil of Ignorance.Justin J. Latterell - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (2):52-54.
Psychedelics as a Holistic Cognitive Enhancement.Richard B. Gibson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (4):355-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
11 (#1,433,119)

6 months
6 (#913,443)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Implantable Brain Chips? Time for Debate.G. Q. Maguire & Ellen M. McGee - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (1):7-13.
Becoming Borg to Become Immortal: Regulating Brain Implant Technologies.Ellen M. Mcgee & Gerald Q. Maguire - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (3):291-302.

Add more references