Abstract

In this companion to ‘Charity, Interpretation, and Belief’, McGinn broadens his attack on Davidson's principle of charity, arguing that charity is no more required for the ascription of notional beliefs than it is for the ascription of relational beliefs. His argument takes the form of a reductio: if Davidson were right that about the inherently charitable nature of interpretation, then, McGinn argues, traditional sceptical worries would not even arise. But that is absurd. In the concluding section, McGinn presents his preferred method of interpretation, according to which the ascription of beliefs and meanings proceeds only after the attribution of perceptual experiences.