Conversational Exercitives and the Force of Pornography

Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (2):155-189 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper criticizes Langton's speech act account of MacKinnon's claim about (the subordinating force of) pornography and offers a different account of how speech might enact harmful norms and thus constitute harm.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,026

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
221 (#121,116)

6 months
14 (#220,939)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mary Kate McGowan
Wellesley College

Citations of this work

Slurs, roles and power.Mihaela Popa-Wyatt & Jeremy L. Wyatt - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 175 (11):2879-2906.
Oppressive speech.Mary Kate McGowan - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):389 – 407.
Does Pornography Presuppose Rape Myths?Richard Kimberly Heck - 2024 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 105 (1):50-74.

View all 47 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
Ontology and Social Construction.Sally Haslanger - 1995 - Philosophical Topics 23 (2):95-125.
Free speech and illocution.Rae Langton & Jennifer Hornsby - 1998 - Legal Theory 4 (1):21-37.
Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts.John R. Searle - 1968 - Philosophical Review 77 (4):405-424.

View all 6 references / Add more references