- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The reification objection to bottom-up cognitive ontology revision
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Philosophy of the behavioral and social sciences: Philosophy of the cognitive sciences / William Bechtel and Mitchell Herschbach. Philosophy of psychology / Edouard Machery. Philosophy of sociology / Daniel Little. Philosophy of economics. [REVIEW]Daniel M. Hausman - 2010 - In Fritz Allhoff (ed.), Philosophies of the Sciences. Malden, MA: Wiley‐Blackwell.
Top-down guidance from a bottom-up theory.Geoffrey R. Loftus - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):17-18.
From the bottom up: The roots of social neuroscience at risk of running dry?Cindy Hamon-Hill & Simon Gadbois - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):426-427.
Bottom-up versus top-down: An alternative to the automatic-attended dilemma?J. P. Banquet, M. J. Smith & B. Renault - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (2):233-234.
Reconciling schizophrenic deficits in top-down and bottom-up processes: Not yet.Angus W. MacDonald - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):96-96.
Lexical access and discourse planning: Bottom-up interference or top-down control troubles?Wendy G. Lehnert - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (3):528-529.
Doing without concepts by Edouard Machery * by Edouard Machery.A. Woodfield - 2010 - Analysis 70 (1):186-188.
The reification of the mind-body problem?Stewart H. Hulse - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):139-140.
Reification and “statification” in attachment theory and research.John C. Masters - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):158-159.
Inhibition.Cynthia M. Connine & Paul C. LoCasto - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):328-328.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-06-07
Downloads
37 (#601,180)
6 months
8 (#549,811)
2019-06-07
Downloads
37 (#601,180)
6 months
8 (#549,811)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Cognitive ontology and the search for neural mechanisms: three foundational problems.Jolien C. Francken, Marc Slors & Carl F. Craver - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-22.
Cognitive systems and the changing brain.Felipe De Brigard - 2017 - Philosophical Explorations 20 (2):224-241.
Evolving Concepts of Functional Localization.Joseph B. McCaffrey - 2023 - Philosophy Compass 18 (5):e12914.
The standard ontological framework of cognitive neuroscience: Some lessons from Broca’s area.Marco Viola & Elia Zanin - 2017 - Philosophical Psychology 30 (7):945-969.
References found in this work
Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain.Michael L. Anderson - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):245.
Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?Russell A. Poldrack - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2):59-63.
In Defense of Reverse Inference.Edouard Machery - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (2):251-267.
Cognitive Ontology and Region- versus Network-Oriented Analyses.Colin Klein - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (5):952-960.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6b8b7fc7ff-tfxs4 uwo