Causation, Vitalism, and Hume

Philosophy and Theology 29 (2):341-351 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Causation has troubled philosophers since the time of Aristotle, and they have sought to clarify the concept of causation because of its implications for other philosophical issues. The most radical change in the meaning of “cause” occurred during the late seventeenth, in which there emerged a strong tendency to understand causal relations as instantiations of deterministic laws. In this essay, I note how early modern philosophers, eminently apparent in Hume, reacted to the notion of vitalism and posited a conception of causation in which it and determinism became virtually equivalent, which thereby denied any sort of vitalistic impulse within matter.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Perceiving causality in action.Robert Reimer - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):14201-14221.
Hume on Thick and Thin Causation.Alexander Bozzo - 2018 - Dissertation, Marquette University
Review of Making Things Happen. [REVIEW]Brad Weslake - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):136-140.
The irreducibility of causation.Richard Swinburne - 1997 - Dialectica 51 (1):79–92.
Laws and Causal Relations.Michael Tooley - 1981 - In Felicia Ackerman (ed.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 93-112.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-16

Downloads
27 (#823,560)

6 months
8 (#578,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bradford McCall
Holy Apostles College and Seminary

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references