Conciliatory aggression and the rhetoric of public apologies: A rhetorical analysis

Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 10 (2):191-204 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article provides a rhetorical analysis of a public apology that was issued by conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh in response to criticism of on-air comments that he made in February 2012. I argue that Limbaugh deployed his apology as a plea for moral exoneration, not as a formal admission of misconduct. Hence his apology was meant to absolve Limbaugh from blame by offsetting acknowledgements of wrongdoing with an appeal to truth as a force for exculpation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fiduciary Duties and the Ethics of Public Apology.Alice MacLachlan - 2018 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (2):359-380.
Gender and Public Apology.Alice MacLachlan - 2013 - Transitional Justice Review 1 (2):126-47.
The categorical apology.Nick Smith - 2005 - Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (4):473–496.
Pope Francis's call for social justice in the global economy.Bruce Duncan - 2014 - The Australasian Catholic Record 91 (2):178.
Art and Artifice in Public Apologies.David P. Boyd - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 104 (3):299-309.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-11

Downloads
21 (#1,008,197)

6 months
10 (#413,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references