A tough nut for proof procedures

Abstract

Here's the article which was a 1964 Stanford AI Memo. After the original memo, several people offered different proofs of the theorem including Shmuel Winograd, Marvin Minsky and Dimitri Stefanyuk - none published, to my knowledge. Winograd claimed that his proof was non-creative, because it didn't use an extraneous idea like the colors of the squares. This set off a contest to see who could produce the most non-creative proof. Minsky's idea was to start with the diagonal next to an excluded corner ssquare, note that 2 dominoes had to project from it to the diagonal with three squares, and from there 1 domino to the four square diagonal, etc. Coming from the other end also leaves only six of the eight squares in the long diagonal covered. Minsky's proof gets high points for non-creativity, because it is specific to the 8 by 8 board. (Using the colors it is easy to show that a Minsky style proof will work for any even sized board.).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
3 (#1,846,357)

6 months
3 (#1,464,642)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John McCarthy
Thomas More College

Citations of this work

Toward a model of representation changes.Richard E. Korf - 1980 - Artificial Intelligence 14 (1):41-78.
Automated design of specialized representations.Jeffrey Van Baalen - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence 54 (1-2):121-198.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references