A Right to Equality? Re-Examining the Case for a Right to Equality

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (4):625 - 642 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the area of politics one is not surprised to encounter bias, prejudice, rationalization, special pleading; yet rarely does one encounter these phenomena so often, so blatantly, as in the area relating to equality. Indeed, even among those whose job it is to be impartial, rational, informed, namely, philosophers, one finds less objectivity, less evidence of a genuine search for the truth, and a greater concern to press preconceived views than elsewhere in their work. Among Western philosophers, there is a very widespread commitment to equality as a political value. So deep has been and is the commitment in theory at least, to this value, that concern for knowledge and truth have been subordinated to it by many — as in the refusal to allow or determination to discourage research into racial differences, for fear that the results of such research may lead to a lesser political commitment to equality. Yet, for all this professed concern for equality, a genuine lover of equality could be excused for being perplexed by the attitudes of those who profess such a concern for equality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
37 (#614,575)

6 months
6 (#879,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Egalitarianism.Bruce M. Landesman - 1983 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):27 - 56.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references