The Asymmetry of Causality: A Realist Solution

Philosophical Investigations 41 (1):3-21 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How do we distinguish between cause and effect? The main argument of this paper is that if a realist account of the meaning of causal statements is adopted, then two clear distinctions between cause and effect emerge. By realist account is meant conceiving a cause as something with a power to act. Since a realist approach to causality is not widely accepted among philosophers, two arguments against a realist approach to causality are countered. The asymmetry of causality is defended against the claim that physics, in the main, describes a symmetrical universe.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-20

Downloads
36 (#631,039)

6 months
9 (#497,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Relational Passage of Time.Matias Slavov - 2022 - New York: Routledge.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Causation.David Lewis - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (17):556-567.
Time and Chance.David Z. Albert - 2000 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Time and Chance.S. French - 2005 - Mind 114 (453):113-116.

View all 16 references / Add more references