Slim models of zermelo set theory

Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):487-496 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Working in Z + KP, we give a new proof that the class of hereditarily finite sets cannot be proved to be a set in Zermelo set theory, extend the method to establish other failures of replacement, and exhibit a formula Φ(λ, a) such that for any sequence $\langle A_{\lambda} \mid \lambda \text{a limit ordinal} \rangle$ where for each $\lambda, A_{\lambda} \subseteq ^{\lambda}2$ , there is a supertransitive inner model of Zermelo containing all ordinals in which for every λ A λ = {α ∣Φ(λ, a)}

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
86 (#241,176)

6 months
16 (#178,915)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Iterative Conception of Set: a (Bi-)Modal Axiomatisation.J. P. Studd - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (5):1-29.
The strength of Mac Lane set theory.A. R. D. Mathias - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 110 (1-3):107-234.
Zermelo and set theory.Akihiro Kanamori - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):487-553.
Mathematical existence.Penelope Maddy - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (3):351-376.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Happy families.A. R. D. Mathias - 1977 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 12 (1):59.
Elements of Set Theory.Herbert B. Enderton - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (1):164-165.
Mengeninduktion und Fundierungsaxiom.Ronald Björn Jensen & Max E. Schröder - 1969 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 12 (3-4):119-133.

Add more references