Molecular Semiotics toward the Emergence of Life

Biosemiotics 1 (1):131-144 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Molecular imprints of organisms serving as both the agents and the products of the underlying sign activities are quantum mechanical in their origins. In particular, molecules in any reaction networks constituting a biological organism are semiotic or context-dependent in the sense that their activities reside within the proper coordination of the entire networks. The origin of life could have been related to a specific aspect of molecular semiotics, especially in the transition from molecules as the physical symbols of material units to molecules as the semiotic signs having the capacity of pointing to something else other than the molecules themselves. Quantum mechanical underpinning of the molecular imprints leading to the emergence of life is in the appraisal of the material capacities of both coherent assimilation and decoherent dissociation already latent in the imprints. One empirical evidence suggesting the likelihood of both coherent assimilation and decoherent dissociation in prebiotic settings could have been found in synthetic chemical reactions running in hydrothermal circulation of seawater through hot vents in the Haedean ocean on the primitive Earth

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Molecules Became Signs.Terrence W. Deacon - forthcoming - Biosemiotics:1-23.
Pharmaceutical Matters.Andrew Barry - 2005 - Theory, Culture and Society 22 (1):51-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
33 (#685,336)

6 months
6 (#858,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On Experimenting on the Emergence of Life : Appraisal of Demonstrative Pronoun.Koichiro Matsuno - 2008 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 16 (1-2):113-131.

Add more citations