Is Prasa $$\dot n$$ ga form of deconstruction?

Journal of Indian Philosophy 20 (4):345-362 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00163010

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Is prasa Boxcloseboxclose\dot N " align="middle" border="0"> ga form of deconstruction?Bimal Krishna Matilal - 1992 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 20 (4).
Is Prasa ga form of deconstruction?Bimal Krishna Matilal - 1992 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 20 (4):345-362.
The Prasa $$dot n$$ gikas' views on logic: Tibetan dGe lugs pa exegesis on the question of Svatantras. [REVIEW]Jos�Ignacio Cabez�N. - 1988 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 16 (3):217-224.
Ga $$\dot n$$ geśa on characterizing veridical awareness.Stephen H. Phillips - 1993 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 21 (2):107-168.
The prasa dot ndot ngikas' views on logic: Tibetan dge lugs pa exegesis on the question of svatantras. [REVIEW]José Ignacio Cabezón - 1988 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 16 (3):217-224.
Ga $$\dot n$$ $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} $$ $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} $$ $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} $$ na of VY?PTI. [REVIEW]Toshihiro Wada - 1995 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 23 (3):273-294.
Ga Boxcloseboxclose_boxclose\dot N $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} $}}{m} " /> $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} $}}{s} " /> $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} $}}{n} " />na of VYĀPTI (1). [REVIEW]Toshihiro Wada - 1995 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 23 (3).
Purport, implicature and presupposition: Sanskrit abhiprāya and Tibetan dgo $$\dot n$$ s pa/dgo $$\dot n$$ s gži as hermeneutical concepts.D. Seyfort Ruegg - 1985 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 13:309.
Śa $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}$}}{n} " />kara and the prasa $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}$}}{n} " />khyānavāda. [REVIEW]Michael Comans - 1996 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 24 (1).
A new plausible exposition of S? $$dot n$$ khya-Karik?Wadhwani-Shah Yashodhara - 1989 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 17 (3):211-224.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-04

Downloads
20 (#1,050,317)

6 months
8 (#613,944)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

De/limiting emptiness and the boundaries of the ineffable.Douglas S. Duckworth - 2010 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (1):97-105.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Double negation in Buddhist logic.Hans G. Herzberger - 1975 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 3 (1-2):3-16.

Add more references