Bio-technical challenges to moral autonomy

In Jai Galliott Mianna Lotz (ed.), Super Soldiers: the Ethical, Legal and Social Consequences. Ashgate. pp. 109-121 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When are soldier enhancements permissible in so far as they affect moral autonomy? This question is answered via the setting out of an important condition for moral autonomy: the capacity agents have for appropriating actions and experiences into a unified morally coherent self-conception.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant's Conception of Personal Autonomy.Paul Formosa - 2013 - Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (3):193-212.
The Value of Freedom.Jochen Bojanowski - 2021 - Proceedings of the XIII. International Kant Congress Oslo 12:431-438.
Kant on Autonomy of the Will.Janis David Schaab - 2022 - In Ben Colburn (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Autonomy. New York, NY: Routledge.
Two Conceptions of Kantian Autonomy.Seniye Tilev - 2021 - In Camilla Serck-Hanssen & Beatrix Himmelmann (eds.), The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. De Gruyter. pp. 1579-1586.
Some tensions between autonomy and self-governance.Jonathan Jacobs - 2003 - Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2):221-244.
How Autonomy Alone Debunks Corporate Moral Agency.David Rönnegard - 2013 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 32 (1-2):77-107.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-11

Downloads
24 (#908,485)

6 months
6 (#856,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steve Matthews
Australian Catholic University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references