When Conversation Goes Wrong: Managing Student Errors

In Brynn F. Welch, The art of teaching philosophy: reflective values and concrete practices. London: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 129-138 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore how to manage student errors in non-traditional philosophy classrooms—where student learning and autonomy are prioritized. We examine the benefits and drawbacks of two models for managing student errors: (1) the philosophical expertise model, whereby instructors are responsible for maximizing the number of true or reasonable claims made in a classroom, including correcting student errors; and (2) the student empowerment model, whereby instructors should be wary of any kind of correction, since more importance is accorded to student autonomy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Norms of Inquiry, Student-Led Learning, and Epistemic Paternalism.Robert Mark Simpson - 2021 - In Jonathan Matheson & Kirk Lougheed, Epistemic Autonomy. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 95-112.
ChatGPT, The CUPID Model, and Low-Stakes Writing.Casey Landers - forthcoming - Aapt Studies in Pedagogy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-09-22

Downloads
7 (#1,675,523)

6 months
7 (#516,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references