Standing up too close or back too far? A slanted history of close film analysis

In Kyle Stevens (ed.), The Oxford handbook of film theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Close Up 1927-1933.James Donald, Anne Friedberg & Laura Marcus - 1998 - Princeton University Press.
The Oxford handbook of film theory.Kyle Stevens (ed.) - 2022 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
In defense of psychoanalytic film theory.Damon R. Young - 2022 - In Kyle Stevens (ed.), The Oxford handbook of film theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Film theory and machine vision.Antonio Somaini - 2022 - In Kyle Stevens (ed.), The Oxford handbook of film theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Buddhism and film theory : beyond a legacy.Victor Fan - 2022 - In Kyle Stevens (ed.), The Oxford handbook of film theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Feminist film theory on the brink of laughter.Maggie Hennefeld - 2022 - In Kyle Stevens (ed.), The Oxford handbook of film theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Film/video/essay.Domietta Torlasco - 2022 - In Kyle Stevens (ed.), The Oxford handbook of film theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references