Returning to Rawls: Social Contracting, Social Justice, and Transcending the Limitations of Locke

Journal of Business Ethics 75 (1):63-76 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A generation ago, the field of business ethics largely abandoned analyzing the broader issue of social justice to focus upon more micro concerns. Donaldson applied the social contract tradition of Locke and Rawls to the ethics of management decision-making, and with Dunfee, has advanced this project ever since. Current events suggest that if the field is to remain relevant it needs to return to examining social and economic fairness, and Rawl's approach to social contracting suggests a way to start. First, however, the field needs to discard the weaker and counterproductive aspects of its Lockean legacy: Locke's hostility to government activism and his indifference with regard to outcomes for the bulk of society. Donaldson's and Dunfee's social contracting approach is not suited to, nor was it designed to, analyze or resolve broad issues of social and economic justice. Their postulated network of communities upon which they rely is problematic in a number of ways, and while they take the legal and political status quo into account, their method does not deal with the historical reality that, as the economic and social environment changes, promoting greater justice requires new and sometimes coercive government interventions. Rawls's work, however, does acknowledge the historically demonstrable necessity of using the power of government to help to achieve desirable social outcomes. While he rejected Mill's methodology, Rawls was inspired by the earlier philosopher's concerns for social justice at a time of major economic change. The field would do well to follow the example of both men in this respect

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,945

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Japanese Moralogy as Business Ethics.Iwao Taka & Thomas W. Dunfee - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (5):507-519.
Plato and Rawls: Justice in Individual or Society?Mohammad Javad Movahedi Said Binaye Motlagh - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 9 (16):197-213.
Understanding of the features of political justice in the concept of John Rawls.A. A. Shulika - 2018 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (1-2):129-135.
Neoliberal social justice: Rawls unveiled.Nicholas Cowen - 2021 - Northhampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rawlsian Self-Respect.Cynthia Stark - 2011 - In Mark Timmons, Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 238-261.
A Theory of Justice. [REVIEW]G. G. - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 26 (4):764-764.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
103 (#216,017)

6 months
7 (#590,730)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Justice as fairness: a restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Morals by agreement.David P. Gauthier - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Two treatises of government.John Locke - 1988 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Peter Laslett.
Collected papers.John Rawls - 1999 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Edited by Samuel Richard Freeman.
Corporations and Morality.Thomas Donaldson - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (3):251-253.

View all 37 references / Add more references