Response to Leahy

Philosophical Psychology 29 (4):517-519 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Brian Leahy and I agree that Ruth Millikan’s teleosemantics, or something very much like it, is the correct approach to the naturalization of intentionality. On the other hand, Leahy’s interesting...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,934

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophical Games With Animals: A Case Study.Dawid Karaś - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 4 (2):51-65.
D. G. Leahy.Lissa McCullough - 2018 - In Christopher D. Rodkey & Jordan E. Miller (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Radical Theology. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 269-280.
Introduction to D. G. Leahy.Lissa Mccullough - 2021 - In Lissa McCullough & Elliot R. Wolfson (eds.), D. G. Leahy and the thinking now occurring. Albany [New York]: State University of New York Press. pp. 1-24.
Glossary of Key Terms in D. G. Leahy.Lissa McCullough - 2021 - In Lissa McCullough & Elliot R. Wolfson (eds.), D. G. Leahy and the thinking now occurring. Albany [New York]: State University of New York Press. pp. 287-316.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-16

Downloads
48 (#465,651)

6 months
8 (#633,132)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Manolo Martínez
Universitat de Barcelona

Citations of this work

The Dilemma of Ahistorical Teleosemantics.Fabian Hundertmark - 2024 - Philosophy of Science 91 (1):58-71.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Teleosemantics and productivity.Manolo Martinez - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (1):47-68.
Millikan’s Isomorphism Requirement.Nicholas Shea - 2012 - In Dan Ryder, Justine Kingsbury & Kenneth Williford (eds.), Millikan and her critics. Malden, MA: Wiley. pp. 63–86.

Add more references