Abstract

I am drawn to a conjecture that I cannot rightly confirm in textual terms, though it cannot be far from the mark as a general philosophical claim: it leads very naturally to the recovery of a neglected picture of the human sciences. I have in mind a reading that goes against the two main analyses Western philosophies have featured in the second half of the nineteenth century and the whole of the twentieth regarding the relationship between the physical and the human sciences: namely, the conviction, favored by positivism and the unity of science program, to the effect that the materialist and extensionalist methodology fitted to the physical sciences— more or less along the lines pressed by Rudolf Carnap and Carl Hempel—should fit the human sciences as well, if we intend to count them as proper sciences; and the alternative conviction, now often dubbed hermeneutic, more or less regularized from Wilhelm Dilthey’s analysis along Kantian lines—which admits a cognate development in the empiricist tradition, as in John Stuart Mill’s account—that sharply disjoins the natural and human sciences as very different kinds of science.