On the kinds of problems tackled by science, technology, and professions. Building foundations of science policy

Mεtascience: Scientific General Discourse 1:79-95 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Science, technology, and professions form a system with strong interactions. Yet, these activities attack different kinds of problems which require different kinds of solutions. The problems that trigger scientific and technological research remain insufficiently solved or unsolved, therefore their possible solutions must be invented (i. e. they are partially or totally original) and, consequently, they should be tested against reality by researchers before considering them as true or useful. On the contrary, the problems that trigger professional inquiry are already solved, or have at least some partial solution at hand that is available in the form of a technical protocol. This solution is applied with caution but without testing (i. e. the professional assumes that the solution works because it was already challenged by researchers). Moreover, science and technology tackle unsolved inverse problems, which allow the radical advancement of knowledge, and genuine innovation. A science policy based on a clear distinction between creative and routine activities (i. e. a cre- atively friendly policy) offers an opportunity for societies to reach value-added innovative economic and integral development.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What’s Left of Philosophy?François Maurice - 2024 - Mεtascience: Scientific General Discourse 3:300-312.
When Philosophy is No Longer Philosophical.François Maurice - 2022 - Mεtascience: Scientific General Discourse 2:242-249.
The Inverse Approach to Technologies.Eduardo Scarano - 2020 - Mεtascience: Scientific General Discourse 1:97-113.
Metascience. For a Scientific General Discourse.François Maurice - 2020 - Mεtascience: Scientific General Discourse 1:31-76.
A Study of Policy Making.Xuan Xi - 1985 - Chinese Studies in Philosophy 16 (4):43.
Bunge’s Metascience and the Naturalization of the General Discourse.François Maurice - 2022 - Mεtascience: Scientific General Discourse 2:74-93.
Bunge and Harman on the General Theory of Objects.Martìn Orensanz - 2022 - Mεtascience: Scientific General Discourse 2:46-64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-13

Downloads
404 (#71,098)

6 months
80 (#77,305)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Introduction: Mario Bunge’s Project.François Maurice - 2020 - Mεtascience: Scientific General Discourse 1:19-28.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Out of My Later Years.Albert Einstein - 1952 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (9):92-93.
Solutions to Problems.[author unknown] - 1956 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (2):215-215.

Add more references