Not Going to Hell on One's Own

Philosophy 58 (226):471 - 480 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Liberalism, or at least twentieth century liberalism, is today out of fashion amongst the electorate of the United States and Britain. Even within the academy—often, contrary to liberalism itself, one of the last institutions to reflect major shifts in ideology—it appears to be losing its grip. The rise of neo-contractarianism in social and political philosophy and neo-conservatism in economics are only two pieces of evidence of its demise. Nevertheless, reports of its death have been greatly exaggerated in some quarters of social philosophy; in particular, it still thrives as the received opinion whenever the issue of paternalism is raised. And, of course, the single most important liberal standard-bearer here is John Stuart Mill

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liberality versus Liberalism.John Milbank - 2006 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2006 (134):6-21.
Liberalism? Forget it.Alexey Alyushin - 2017 - Axiomathes 27 (4):375-391.
Republican Moments in Political Liberalism.Anthony Simon Laden - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):217-237.
The Attack on Liberalism.Mark R. Reiff - 2007 - In Michael D. A. Freeman & Ross Harrison (eds.), Law and philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Critique as ideology critique in a neoliberal age.Pauline Johnson - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (7):810-828.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
28 (#799,564)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Paternalism, part II.David J. Garren - 2007 - Philosophical Books 48 (1):50-59.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mill on Liberty.Daniel Little - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (3):434.

Add more references