Defining human sciences: Theodor Waitz’s influence on Dilthey

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (3):498-518 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The work of Theodor Waitz is an important but hitherto unnoticed source of Dilthey’s concept of ‘human sciences’. Waitz was an outstanding philosopher and psychologist who, in the late 1850s, devoted himself wholeheartedly to empirical anthropology. In this field Waitz distinguished himself for his defence of the unity of humankind against mainstream polygenic and racial doctrines. Waitz inspired Dilthey’s articulation of psychology into two branches: the ‘descriptive’ one and the ‘explanative’ one. Even more remarkably, in a work reviewed by Dilthey in warmly favourable terms, Waitz explicitly mentioned and defined the ‘sciences which treat of the spirit ’. Some of Dilthey's most interesting ideas are thus prefigured in Waitz’s long underrated work.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,945

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anthropology and History in the Early Dilthey.Nabeel Hamid - 2023 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 100 (C):90-98.
Dilthey on the unity of science.Nabeel Hamid - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (4):635-656.
Dilthey: Philosopher of the Human Studies. [REVIEW]N. T. H. - 1976 - Review of Metaphysics 30 (1):132-133.
What Is Descriptive Psychology?Christian Damböck - 2020 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (1):274-289.
'Hypotheses, everywhere only hypotheses!': on some contexts of Dilthey's critique of explanatory psychology.Uljana Feest - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (1):43-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-06

Downloads
40 (#614,025)

6 months
5 (#830,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Riccardo Martinelli
Università degli Studi di Trieste

Citations of this work

Anthropology and History in the Early Dilthey.Nabeel Hamid - 2023 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 100 (C):90-98.
aporte de Dilthey a la hermenéutica y la psicología investigativa.Rolly Guillermo Rivas Huaman - 2022 - Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades 11 (5):1-6.

Add more citations