Britain’s best-loved dope dealer

The Philosophers' Magazine 54 (54):121-126 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“His hypothesis is that if you take dope you’re going to end up taking smack, but he’d actually got an incorrect application of Bayes’ theorem... the gateway theory, all obviously complete bollocks, based on a professor’s ineptitude in statistics.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Existentially Dope.Devon Johnson - 2019 - The Philosophers' Magazine 86:36-43.
You’re not wrong, Walter, you’re just an asshole.Daniel P. Malloy - 2012 - The Philosophers' Magazine 58:53-56.
No offence, but you’re a loon.Wendy M. Grossman - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 47:127-128.
Human constructions.Michael Frayn - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 47 (47):120-126.
The Year I Got Old.William B. Irvine - 2020 - The Philosophers' Magazine 91:78-83.
The best of all possible worlds.Michael C. LaBossiere - 2002 - The Philosophers' Magazine 18:58-58.
What Fodor got wrong. [REVIEW]John Dupré - 2010 - The Philosophers' Magazine 50 (50):118-120.
The austere optimist.Julian Baggini - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 47:25-33.
Anglo-Saxon reserve.Julian Baggini - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 43 (43):60-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
79 (#266,673)

6 months
12 (#308,345)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references