When is it right to rescue? A response to Pasic and Weiss

Ethics and International Affairs 11:145–150 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Arguing that humanitarian agencies cannot always actively pursue political agendas, Mapel argues that in deciding whether there is an obligation to intervene, the nature of the conflict, the costs and risks of intervention, and other factors must all be taken into consideration

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

NGOs and the humanitarian impulse: Some have it right.Andrew Natsios - 1997 - Ethics and International Affairs 11:133–136.
The natural basis of political obligation.George Klosko - 2001 - Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (1):93-114.
Islam, christianity, and forcible humanitarian intervention.Oliver P. Ramsbotham - 1998 - Ethics and International Affairs 12:81–102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
27 (#890,884)

6 months
12 (#262,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references