Ritual without belief? Kierkegaard against Rappaport on personal belief and ritual action, with particular reference to Jonathan Lear’s ‘A Case for Irony’

International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 79 (3):222-234 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper presents a Kierkegaardian critique of Roy A. Rappaport’s classic treatment of religious rituals. It discusses Rappaport’s claim that public and outward acceptance of a religious ritual is sufficient for successfully enacting it – even where such acceptance is devoid of any personal commitment on the participants’ part. To interrogate Rappaport, the paper develops Jonathan Lear’s reading of Kierkegaard and builds on the Danish theologian’s remarks on the Christian sacraments to argue that, pace Rappaport, personal engagement is necessary to the successful enactment of religious rituals. In this sense, I will show with Kierkegaard how inner belief is a necessary pre-requisite for the performance of any religious ritual whereas in Rappaport’s view it is ritual action itself which creates a posteriori the possibility for personal religious faith.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Innovation, adaptation, and maintaining the balance.Heikki Pesonen - 2022 - Approaching Religion 12 (3):16-31.
Religion Without Speech?Lance Ashdown - 2003 - Ars Disputandi 3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-14

Downloads
39 (#575,743)

6 months
15 (#204,260)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?