Taking Feminist Pornography Seriously

Film and Philosophy 28:19-37 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has been argued that an adequate feminist response to sexist pornography demands not just efforts to eradicate sexist beliefs, but also aesthetic counter-intervention at the level of taste. This view motivates support for feminist pornography. This paper takes the feminist pornography suggestion seriously by unpacking difficulties for the project. I begin by spelling out two views about what makes feminist pornography feminist: the ‘content view,’ and the ‘context view,’ and discuss what I take to be existing arguments for the latter. I then present two objections to the context view: the first focuses on how we characteristically interact with pornography (as a masturbatory aid), the second challenges the value of authenticity upon which much feminist pornography rests. If these arguments are correct, then there are serious flaws with feminist pornography as it is commonly conceived. I close with a brief suggestion of an alternative approach rooted in feminist solidarity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-19

Downloads
834 (#27,726)

6 months
390 (#4,548)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Georgie Malone
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Speech acts and unspeakable acts.Rae Langton - 1993 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (4):293-330.
How to Do Things With Pornography.Nancy Bauer - 2015 - Harvard Univeristy Press. Edited by Sanford Shieh & Alice Crary.
Art, Emotion and Ethics.Berys Gaut - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):199-201.
A Sensible Antiporn Feminism.A. W. Eaton - 2007 - Ethics 117 (4):674-715.

View all 10 references / Add more references