The Best Essay Ever: the fallacy of wishful thinking

Review of Contemporary Philosophy 12 (1):30-42 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that wishful thinking is an informal logical fallacy and is distinguished from self-deception and delusion. Wishful thinking is unique in that a human desire is the starting point, which remains unfulfilled because of insufficient or no evidence or ignorance, despite the agent’s beliefs. It contrasts with self-deception, a more serious mental state in which the agent hides or denies the truth from himself, regardless of whether it is desired. Wishful thinking is a logical fallacy, depending on the agent’s genuine beliefs as an epistemic dilemma or merely a harmless fantasy. pp. 30–42

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wishful thinking and self-deception.Bela Szabados - 1973 - Analysis 33 (June):201-205.
How Is Wishful Seeing Like Wishful Thinking?Susanna Siegel - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (2):408-435.
How wishful seeing is not like wishful thinking.Robert Long - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 175 (6):1401-1421.
Self-deception without paradox.Dante A. Cosentino - 1980 - Philosophy Research Archives 1388:443-465.
Perspectives on Self-Deception.Amelie Oksenberg Rorty & Brian P. McLaughlin - 1988 - University of California Press. Edited by Brian P. McLaughlin & Amélie Oksenberg Rorty.
Self-deception and emotional coherence.Baljinder Sahdra & Paul R. Thagard - 2003 - Minds and Machines 13 (2):213-231.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-13

Downloads
540 (#52,318)

6 months
68 (#86,023)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Maller
Duquesne University (PhD)

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references