On God and Our Ultimate Purpose

Free Inquiry 31:35-37 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

William Lane Craig often defends theism by arguing that human life is meaningful only if it has ultimate significance, and it has ultimate significance only if God exists to give human life ultimate purpose. Developing an idea from Thomas Nagel, I rebut Craig's argument. I contend that the concept of ultimate purpose is incoherent, and hence ultimate significance is impossible even if God exists. Ultimate significance is a fantasy that shouldn't draw anyone to theism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fairness and futility.Toby Betenson - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (2):101-111.
God as the ultimate thou and meaning of life in Buber, Martin.G. Kovacs - 1994 - Ultimate Reality and Meaning 17 (1):33-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
1 (#1,942,953)

6 months
1 (#1,885,840)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Maitzen
Acadia University

Citations of this work

Questioning the Question.Stephen Maitzen - 2013 - In Tyron Goldschmidt (ed.), The Puzzle of Existence: Why is There Something Rather Than Nothing? New York: Routledge. pp. 252-271.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references