When the coefficient hits the clinic: Effect size and the size of the effect

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):211-211 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The usefulness of effect-size differs in utilitarian experiments from its use in theory corroborations. Chow introduces the question of the relationship of effect-size to practical validity and the role of the assessment of “importance” in this. This review develops this question and suggests the actuarial table as a replacement for effect-size in practical decision-making.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Précis of statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):169-194.
The critics rebutted: A pyrrhic victory.Stephan Lewandowsky & Murray Maybery - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):210-211.
Effect of size on visual slant.Robert B. Freeman Jr - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (1):96.
The non-significance of straw man arguments.Niels G. Waller & Wesley O. Johnson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):226-227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
45 (#497,219)

6 months
18 (#166,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references