Taxonomy, ontology, and natural kinds

Synthese 195 (4):1427-1439 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When we ask what natural kinds are, there are two different things we might have in mind. The first, which I’ll call the taxonomy question, is what distinguishes a category which is a natural kind from an arbitrary class. The second, which I’ll call the ontology question, is what manner of stuff there is that realizes the category. Many philosophers have systematically conflated the two questions. The confusion is exhibited both by essentialists and by philosophers who pose their accounts in terms of similarity. It also leads to misreading philosophers who do make the distinction. Distinguishing the questions allows for a more subtle understanding of both natural kinds and their underlying metaphysics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-19

Downloads
781 (#30,670)

6 months
123 (#44,790)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

P. D. Magnus
State University of New York, Albany

References found in this work

Writing the Book of the World.Theodore Sider - 2011 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
A System of Logic.John Stuart Mill - 1829/2002 - Longman.
Scientific Essentialism.Brian Ellis - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits.Bertrand Russell - 1948 - London and New York: Routledge.

View all 38 references / Add more references