Gender Indoctrination

Journal of Speculative Philosophy 39 (1):58-69 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores the phenomenon of stay-at-home daughterhood to demonstrate how this practice provides a stark contrast to the requirements and rewards of genuine education. It does so, the article argues, both through its dependence upon isolation and indoctrination and its allegiance to conceptions of femininity and masculinity that reveal themselves to be uninhabitable, the latter by trying to cultivate an impossible aspiration to omnipotence and the former by violating what Peirce identifies as “the sole rule of reason,” which is “to not block the road of inquiry.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,804

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hoe politiek mag onderwijs zijn?Anouk Zuurmond & Piet van der Ploeg - 2022 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 114 (4):391-409.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-02-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Habit, Competence, and Purpose: How to Make the Grades of Clarity Clearer.Vincent Colapietro - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (3):348-377.

Add more references