Why Liberalism Is More Important than Secularism

Télos 2014 (167):88-106 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

1. We Are Not Postsecular Because We Have Never Been Secular This journal issue is entitled “Are We Postsecular?” and therefore—as always with these “postisms”—we face a certain measure of ambiguity from the outset. The term “postsecular” was made popular among scholars by Jürgen Habermas some years ago.1 Being “postsecular” now implies having been “secular” previously. The term is normally used to refer to countries, beginning with those of Western Europe, in which religious ties have been supposed to have collapsed over recent centuries, thus progressively debarring religion from the public sphere. Postsecularism 's central idea should thus be the return….

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
13 (#1,322,877)

6 months
7 (#710,381)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical.John Rawls - 1985 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (3):223-251.
The Independence of Moral Theory.John Rawls - 1974 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48:5 - 22.

Add more references