The limits of neo-Roman liberty

History of Political Thought 23 (3):418-431 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While writers of the English Civil War abstracted from Roman sources a theory of liberty, the original res publica, always under the control of a unified and entrenched oligarchy, presents a threadbare fabric of liberty. Yet an impressive strand of modern republicanism follows this example: Philip Pettit's 'liberty as non-domination' appears to be inimical to notions of government power, overlooking that power is sometimes necessary to protect freedoms. Quentin Skinner sharpens this classical focus on a 'neo-Roman' theory. In Pettit a republican suspicion of popular government underplays contributions to the history of freedom from the Athenian democracy

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
31 (#776,157)

6 months
5 (#752,882)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Structural domination in the labor market.Lillian Cicerchia - 2022 - European Journal of Political Theory 21 (1).
Republicanism.Frank Lovett - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Conservative Roots of Republicanism.Manjeet Ramgotra - 2014 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 61 (139):22-49.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references