Explanation in psychoanalysis and history

Philosophy of Science 33 (3):278-286 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A number of authors recently have pointed out what they think are enlightening similarities between psychoanalysis and history. In stressing such similarities they are usually trying to justify their own particular characterization of psychoanalysis. I show wherein I think these characterizations go wrong and at the same time try my own hand at clarifying the nature of psychoanalytic propositions

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
53 (#413,130)

6 months
14 (#239,352)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The scientific status of psychoanalytic clinical evidence (I).Michael Martin - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):13 – 36.
The status of psychoanalytic theory.B. A. Farrell - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):104 – 123.
Psychoanalysis, man, and value.Asher Moore - 1961 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 4 (1-4):53 – 65.

Add more references